{"attribution":"MCP Queen — the evidence layer for MCP (https://mcpqueen.com)","license":"CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution and a link to mcpqueen.com","methodology":"https://mcpqueen.com/registry#methodology","docs":"https://mcpqueen.com/api","generated_at":"2026-10-02T12:15:45.763Z","server":{"name":"ai.asrm/asrm","title":"ASRM (AI Search Rank Monitor)","description":"Check a website's AI readiness and answer AI visibility and GEO questions from ASRM's guides.","version":"1.0.0","remote_url":"https://asrm.ai/mcp","repo_url":null},"operational_grade":{"grade":"A","score":97,"provisional":0,"reachable":1,"auth_state":"open","latency_ms":176,"tool_count":4,"probed_at":"2026-10-02T08:16:10.652Z","evidence":[{"criterion":"reachability","points":25,"max":25,"evidence":"HTTP 200, initialize accepted in 176ms"},{"criterion":"protocol","points":15,"max":15,"evidence":"valid JSON-RPC initialize result, protocolVersion 2025-06-18, serverInfo asrm@1.0.0"},{"criterion":"tooling","points":35,"max":35,"evidence":"tools/list OK: 4 tools e.g. \"check_ai_readiness\"; 4/4 described, 4/4 fully-typed schemas, median description 393 chars"},{"criterion":"latency","points":10,"max":10,"evidence":"initialize round-trip 176ms"},{"criterion":"provenance","points":12,"max":15,"evidence":"description present; no repository URL; version 1.0.0; namespace ai.asrm matches endpoint/repo"}],"protocol_access":"open"},"field_semantics":{"auth_state":"Deprecated name retained for compatibility. It means protocol handshake/discovery access only, not tool-level data entitlement.","protocol_access":"Preferred name for auth_state."},"audit_state":"observations_published","observations":[{"dimension":"citation_quality","metric":"citation_capability_advertised","status":"unverified","value_text":null,"evidence":"Metadata/tool descriptions advertise citation or evidence capability: EO): how ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini choose which brands to mention and cite, how to get cited, how to track brand mentions, share of voice, and what an AI visibility score measures. No response-level citation benchmark has verified this claim yet.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-10-02T08:16:10.652Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"},{"dimension":"security","metric":"authentication_boundary","status":"observed","value_text":"open","evidence":"Live protocol probe observed auth_state=open. This describes discovery/access behavior; it is not by itself a vulnerability finding.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-10-02T08:16:10.652Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"}],"response_benchmarks":[],"reviewed_field_reports":[],"interpretation":"Dimensions are independent; missing evidence is not a pass; field reports are qualitative, moderated and never votes."}