{"attribution":"MCP Queen — the evidence layer for MCP (https://mcpqueen.com)","license":"CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution and a link to mcpqueen.com","methodology":"https://mcpqueen.com/registry#methodology","docs":"https://mcpqueen.com/api","generated_at":"2026-07-24T14:19:36.801Z","server":{"name":"ai.jurisprudencias/case-law","title":"Jurisprudências.ai","description":"Search Brazilian case law from federal and state courts with verified decisions and source links.","version":"1.0.0","remote_url":"https://jurisprudencias.ai/mcp","repo_url":null},"operational_grade":{"grade":"D","score":57,"provisional":1,"reachable":1,"auth_state":"auth-wellbehaved","latency_ms":682,"tool_count":null,"probed_at":"2026-07-24T11:46:29.433Z","evidence":[{"criterion":"reachability","points":18,"max":25,"evidence":"HTTP 401 in 682ms — auth required; WWW-Authenticate present: \"Bearer realm=\"Jurisprudências.ai\", resource_metadata=\"https://jurisprudencias.ai/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource\", \""},{"criterion":"protocol","points":0,"max":15,"evidence":"handshake not reachable behind auth — unverified"},{"criterion":"tooling","points":0,"max":0,"evidence":"auth-gated — tooling unverifiable, excluded from score (grade marked provisional)"},{"criterion":"latency","points":7,"max":10,"evidence":"initialize round-trip 682ms"},{"criterion":"provenance","points":12,"max":15,"evidence":"description present; no repository URL; version 1.0.0; namespace ai.jurisprudencias matches endpoint/repo"}],"protocol_access":"auth-wellbehaved"},"field_semantics":{"auth_state":"Deprecated name retained for compatibility. It means protocol handshake/discovery access only, not tool-level data entitlement.","protocol_access":"Preferred name for auth_state."},"audit_state":"observations_published","observations":[{"dimension":"security","metric":"authentication_boundary","status":"observed","value_text":"auth-wellbehaved","evidence":"Live protocol probe observed auth_state=auth-wellbehaved. This describes discovery/access behavior; it is not by itself a vulnerability finding.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-07-24T11:46:29.433Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"}],"response_benchmarks":[],"reviewed_field_reports":[],"interpretation":"Dimensions are independent; missing evidence is not a pass; field reports are qualitative, moderated and never votes."}