{"attribution":"MCP Queen — the evidence layer for MCP (https://mcpqueen.com)","license":"CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution and a link to mcpqueen.com","methodology":"https://mcpqueen.com/registry#methodology","docs":"https://mcpqueen.com/api","generated_at":"2026-08-16T13:42:40.304Z","server":{"name":"com.attestwire/en16931","title":"Attestwire","description":"EN 16931: validate invoice data or a UBL/CII file, emit UBL or CII XML. XRechnung, Peppol. Not PDF.","version":"1.1.2","remote_url":"https://api.attestwire.com/mcp","repo_url":null},"operational_grade":{"grade":"A","score":97,"provisional":0,"reachable":1,"auth_state":"open","latency_ms":68,"tool_count":9,"probed_at":"2026-08-16T07:00:34.522Z","evidence":[{"criterion":"reachability","points":25,"max":25,"evidence":"HTTP 200, initialize accepted in 68ms"},{"criterion":"protocol","points":15,"max":15,"evidence":"valid JSON-RPC initialize result, protocolVersion 2025-06-18, serverInfo attestwire@1.0.0"},{"criterion":"tooling","points":35,"max":35,"evidence":"tools/list OK: 9 tools e.g. \"validate_invoice\"; 9/9 described, 9/9 fully-typed schemas, median description 474 chars"},{"criterion":"latency","points":10,"max":10,"evidence":"initialize round-trip 68ms"},{"criterion":"provenance","points":12,"max":15,"evidence":"description present; no repository URL; version 1.1.2; namespace com.attestwire matches endpoint/repo"}],"protocol_access":"open"},"field_semantics":{"auth_state":"Deprecated name retained for compatibility. It means protocol handshake/discovery access only, not tool-level data entitlement.","protocol_access":"Preferred name for auth_state."},"audit_state":"observations_published","observations":[{"dimension":"claim_verification","metric":"advertised_corpus_scale","status":"unverified","value_text":"1 document, 100 documents, 2,500 documents","evidence":"Advertised corpus-size expression(s) found in public metadata/tool descriptions: 1 document, 100 documents, 2,500 documents. Black-box discovery does not establish corpus coverage; a manifest or sampled benchmark is required.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-08-16T07:00:34.522Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"},{"dimension":"citation_quality","metric":"citation_capability_advertised","status":"unverified","value_text":null,"evidence":"Metadata/tool descriptions advertise citation or evidence capability: s: a few arithmetic/decimal rules have no write-up yet, and for those it says so and links the rule reference rather than pretending the rule does not exist. No response-level citation benchmark has verified this claim yet.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-08-16T07:00:34.522Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"},{"dimension":"security","metric":"authentication_boundary","status":"observed","value_text":"open","evidence":"Live protocol probe observed auth_state=open. This describes discovery/access behavior; it is not by itself a vulnerability finding.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-08-16T07:00:34.522Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"}],"response_benchmarks":[],"reviewed_field_reports":[],"interpretation":"Dimensions are independent; missing evidence is not a pass; field reports are qualitative, moderated and never votes."}