{"attribution":"MCP Queen — the evidence layer for MCP (https://mcpqueen.com)","license":"CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution and a link to mcpqueen.com","methodology":"https://mcpqueen.com/registry#methodology","docs":"https://mcpqueen.com/api","generated_at":"2026-09-23T19:22:44.462Z","server":{"name":"com.rekvira/rekvira","title":"Rekvira: EU regulation pinpoints for compliance AI","description":"Official EU regulation text with article and recital pinpoints over MCP. Keyless trial.","version":"0.1.0","remote_url":"https://mcp.rekvira.com/mcp","repo_url":null},"operational_grade":{"grade":"A","score":94,"provisional":0,"reachable":1,"auth_state":"open","latency_ms":795,"tool_count":17,"probed_at":"2026-09-23T14:16:53.566Z","evidence":[{"criterion":"reachability","points":25,"max":25,"evidence":"HTTP 200, initialize accepted in 795ms"},{"criterion":"protocol","points":15,"max":15,"evidence":"valid JSON-RPC initialize result, protocolVersion 2025-06-18, serverInfo rekvira@0.1.0"},{"criterion":"tooling","points":35,"max":35,"evidence":"tools/list OK: 17 tools e.g. \"connect\"; 17/17 described, 17/17 fully-typed schemas, median description 220 chars"},{"criterion":"latency","points":7,"max":10,"evidence":"initialize round-trip 795ms"},{"criterion":"provenance","points":12,"max":15,"evidence":"description present; no repository URL; version 0.1.0; namespace com.rekvira matches endpoint/repo"}],"protocol_access":"open"},"field_semantics":{"auth_state":"Deprecated name retained for compatibility. It means protocol handshake/discovery access only, not tool-level data entitlement.","protocol_access":"Preferred name for auth_state."},"audit_state":"observations_published","observations":[{"dimension":"citation_quality","metric":"citation_capability_advertised","status":"unverified","value_text":null,"evidence":"Metadata/tool descriptions advertise citation or evidence capability: Arts 22/54 verify_citation Verify a citation someone else produced — does the pinpoint exist in held text, and optionally does the quote appear. No response-level citation benchmark has verified this claim yet.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-23T14:16:53.566Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"},{"dimension":"security","metric":"sensitive_capabilities_declared","status":"concern","value_text":"delete_workflow","evidence":"1 discovered tool(s) advertise potentially state-changing or privileged capabilities. Tool names: delete_workflow. Classification is description-based and does not prove exploitability.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":1,"observed_at":"2026-09-23T14:16:53.566Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"},{"dimension":"security","metric":"authentication_boundary","status":"observed","value_text":"open","evidence":"Live protocol probe observed auth_state=open. This describes discovery/access behavior; it is not by itself a vulnerability finding.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-23T14:16:53.566Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"}],"response_benchmarks":[],"reviewed_field_reports":[],"interpretation":"Dimensions are independent; missing evidence is not a pass; field reports are qualitative, moderated and never votes."}