{"attribution":"MCP Queen — the evidence layer for MCP (https://mcpqueen.com)","license":"CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution and a link to mcpqueen.com","methodology":"https://mcpqueen.com/registry#methodology","docs":"https://mcpqueen.com/api","generated_at":"2026-09-19T01:12:22.150Z","server":{"name":"io.github.Atomic-Mail/mcp","title":"Atomic Mail","description":"Programmable email inbox for AI agents — JMAP, PoW auth, stdio MCP server.","version":"0.3.27","remote_url":"https://mcp.atomicmail.ai/mcp","repo_url":"https://github.com/Atomic-Mail/atomic-mail-agentic"},"operational_grade":{"grade":"C","score":62,"provisional":1,"reachable":1,"auth_state":"auth-wellbehaved","latency_ms":769,"tool_count":null,"probed_at":"2026-09-18T21:45:53.727Z","evidence":[{"criterion":"reachability","points":18,"max":25,"evidence":"HTTP 401 in 769ms — auth required; WWW-Authenticate present: \"Bearer resource_metadata=\"https://mcp.atomicmail.ai/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp\", ApiKey help=\"https://dash\""},{"criterion":"protocol","points":0,"max":15,"evidence":"handshake not reachable behind auth — unverified"},{"criterion":"tooling","points":0,"max":0,"evidence":"auth-gated — tooling unverifiable, excluded from score (grade marked provisional)"},{"criterion":"latency","points":7,"max":10,"evidence":"initialize round-trip 769ms"},{"criterion":"provenance","points":15,"max":15,"evidence":"description present; repository linked; version 0.3.27; namespace io.github.Atomic-Mail matches endpoint/repo"}],"protocol_access":"auth-wellbehaved"},"field_semantics":{"auth_state":"Deprecated name retained for compatibility. It means protocol handshake/discovery access only, not tool-level data entitlement.","protocol_access":"Preferred name for auth_state."},"audit_state":"observations_published","observations":[{"dimension":"security","metric":"authentication_boundary","status":"observed","value_text":"auth-wellbehaved","evidence":"Live protocol probe observed auth_state=auth-wellbehaved. This describes discovery/access behavior; it is not by itself a vulnerability finding.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-18T21:45:53.727Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"}],"response_benchmarks":[],"reviewed_field_reports":[],"interpretation":"Dimensions are independent; missing evidence is not a pass; field reports are qualitative, moderated and never votes."}