{"attribution":"MCP Queen — the evidence layer for MCP (https://mcpqueen.com)","license":"CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution and a link to mcpqueen.com","methodology":"https://mcpqueen.com/registry#methodology","docs":"https://mcpqueen.com/api","generated_at":"2026-10-03T10:47:58.265Z","server":{"name":"io.github.simonmak-ascent/opencode-workbench","title":null,"description":"Provision an OpenCode workbench and MCP stack on any Linux box, local or over SSH.","version":"4.0.1","remote_url":"https://opencode-workbench.simonmak.com/mcp","repo_url":"https://github.com/simonmak-ascent/opencode-workbench"},"operational_grade":{"grade":"A","score":100,"provisional":0,"reachable":1,"auth_state":"open","latency_ms":159,"tool_count":10,"probed_at":"2026-10-03T05:01:07.496Z","evidence":[{"criterion":"reachability","points":25,"max":25,"evidence":"HTTP 200, initialize accepted in 159ms"},{"criterion":"protocol","points":15,"max":15,"evidence":"valid JSON-RPC initialize result, protocolVersion 2025-06-18, serverInfo opencode-workbench@4.0.1"},{"criterion":"tooling","points":35,"max":35,"evidence":"tools/list OK: 10 tools e.g. \"describe_workbench\"; 10/10 described, 10/10 fully-typed schemas, median description 645 chars"},{"criterion":"latency","points":10,"max":10,"evidence":"initialize round-trip 159ms"},{"criterion":"provenance","points":15,"max":15,"evidence":"description present; repository linked; version 4.0.1; namespace io.github.simonmak-ascent matches endpoint/repo"}],"protocol_access":"open"},"field_semantics":{"auth_state":"Deprecated name retained for compatibility. It means protocol handshake/discovery access only, not tool-level data entitlement.","protocol_access":"Preferred name for auth_state."},"audit_state":"observations_published","observations":[{"dimension":"citation_quality","metric":"citation_capability_advertised","status":"unverified","value_text":null,"evidence":"Metadata/tool descriptions advertise citation or evidence capability: list_required_credentials List the credentials the profile references, which the target already provides, and how to acquire each missing one. No response-level citation benchmark has verified this claim yet.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-10-03T05:01:07.496Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"},{"dimension":"security","metric":"sensitive_capabilities_declared","status":"concern","value_text":"inspect_target, apply_clone, list_required_credentials, run_auth_flow","evidence":"4 discovered tool(s) advertise potentially state-changing or privileged capabilities. Tool names: inspect_target, apply_clone, list_required_credentials, run_auth_flow. Classification is description-based and does not prove exploitability.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":4,"observed_at":"2026-10-03T05:01:07.496Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"},{"dimension":"security","metric":"authentication_boundary","status":"observed","value_text":"open","evidence":"Live protocol probe observed auth_state=open. This describes discovery/access behavior; it is not by itself a vulnerability finding.","source_type":"live_probe","sample_size":null,"observed_at":"2026-10-03T05:01:07.496Z","methodology_version":"trust-v1"}],"response_benchmarks":[],"reviewed_field_reports":[],"interpretation":"Dimensions are independent; missing evidence is not a pass; field reports are qualitative, moderated and never votes."}